Argument Is War–Or is it a Game of Chess
Argument Is War–Or is it a Game of Chess?
Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors
David Ritchie
Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 125-146.
Abstract
Both Lakoff and Johnson (1980) and Vervaeke and Kennedy (1996), in their critique of Lakoff and Johnson, draw narrowly from a broad range of reasonable interpretations of the metaphors they analyze. Expanding the interpretations vitiates many of Vervaeke and Kennedy’s criticisms, but it supports their call for an open interpretation of groups of metaphors, and points toward a more complex elaboration of the theories put forth by Lakoff and his colleagues.








